Sunday, December 23, 2018

Vallein Tercinier Lot 89 Fins Bois for Maltbarn 51%



I’m excited that indie bottlers are looking more and more to cognac. Indie bottlers really pushed the envelope for scotch and they could do the same thing with cognac (if they take the right approach). Maltbarn is a great indie scotch bottler so it was nice to see them pick a VT.

Here are my notes...

Nose: caramel, candy apple, canned peaches, honeydew, and rice pudding

Palate: peaches and apricots...this is really fruity...plenty of vanilla, walnuts, and caramel...some light orange liqueur notes in the background

Finish: great length, has plenty of staying power

Thoughts: this was a great selection - I definitely wouldn’t mind having a few of these in the bunker. The flavors are well integrated and there is no astringency. It’s sold out now, unfortunately, but I bet VT is sitting on plenty of casks like this - seldom do they disappoint.

Grade: A minus

Saturday, December 22, 2018

Remi Landier Heritage (first edition) 43%



Ryan, god bless his soul, ponied up $240 to snag this bottle, and I’m thankful he shared.

Remi Landier, which is a grower / producer located in the Fins Bois region, has released two versions of the Heritage, the first version being bottled at 43% and the second version (called the “Coupe No. 2”) was bottled at 45%. The Heritage (both bottles) contain some of the oldest cognacs produced by Remi Landier, which started distilling in the early 1970s. The Heritage is a blend of Fins Bois and Grande Champagne grapes.

Serge reviewed the Coupe No. 2 and gave it an admirable 90 points.

Here are my thoughts on the first iteration of the Heritage:

Nose: pears, buttercream, fig, slightly floral with some tangerine rind

Palate: orchard fruits and sweet cream flavors...butterscotch, mocha, toasted almond and honeysuckle,

Finish: really nice length for 43% and the creamy flavors really hang onto the mid palate for a while.

Thoughts: this is lovely brandy and I'd love to snag a bottle, but at its current price, the sticker shock alone is enough to prevent me from acquiring one of these, unfortunately.

Grade: an easy A minus

UPDATE: The new Coupe N.2 is $500sh which seems a bit steep.

Frapin Chateau Fontpinot 20 Year 1991 41.2%


Man, this place has been dead. Let's breathe some life into this blog again.

This is a quick review of a Frapin vintage dated cognac. Frapin is located in Grande Champagne and has been producing cognac since the 1600s, way before Marie Antoinette had a date with the guillotine. Frapin is a grower / producer and their estate is 240 hectares. The Frapin website provides a lot of details about the house and I've linked the website below.

I purchased a sample of this bottle from an overseas retailer.

N: caramel, pears, apricots, and some brisk sea air

P: toffee candies, red delicious apples, walnuts and apricots...some bitter citrus rind, too. It’s mildly astringent for being lower proof and there is some oak at work.

F: medium length where bitter citrus rind is the last note to taper off.

Thoughts: this cognac was fine. Nothing awe inspiring, nothing offensive. It's definitely overpriced at 150sh usd.

Grade: B -









Wednesday, December 12, 2018

1995 Domaine de Maouhum 23 Year Old for K&L, 46%

Ryan's Notes

 

1995 Domaine de Maouhum 23 Year Old for K&L, 46%

 

 

Domaine de Maouhum is a small house located in the Bas-Armagnac region. This particular armagnac is a 1995 vintage that was selected by K&L and bottled at 46%.

Nose:  There is fresh fruits, mainly berries and cherries. A little must and funk. Cedar. 

Taste:  This is immediately juicy, with touches of honey over a spread of syrupy fruits - raspberries, cherries, apples, orange. Moving forward there is some deeper notes of milk chocolate and caramel.

Finish: It finishes on gently drying oak.  With some layers of aromatic bitters, and lingering fruit sweetness.

Overall:  This is a well-integrated and utterly fruity armagnac.  Totally satisfying.   This was available for $85. Gone now, but perhaps worth keeping an eye peeled for a future release from this house.

A-

Sunday, October 28, 2018

Vallein Tercinier 46°

Ryan's Notes




Vallein Tercinier is a producer that we continue to circle back around to, and I think with good reason. A small house that offers pure unadulterated cognac.  They offer quite a bit in the way of different vintages from various regions, as well as several great blends. There's a lot to dive into with this one house, and quality remains high.  They're not all stunners, but there are quite a few that have become benchmark cognacs for me.  Earlier in the year they released a new cognac blend, simply called 46°. It follows the ethos of the house being non-chillfiltered and unadulterated.  This release is a blend of two batches of cognac; one 15 year from the Fins Bois region and one 25 year from the Bons Bois region.  This is, of course, bottled at a respectable 46%.



Nose:  Sweet and aromatic.  A bowl of fresh fruit.  Honey and stone fruits. Tobacco. Floral, as well, although don't ask me to name the types.   It's a very inviting nose. Emphasis on freshness.

Taste:  Similar to the nose. Starts with lightly spiced fruits and honey.  Cinnamon dusted peaches and nectarines. Medium thick and slightly sticky mouthfeel.

Finish: The rich fruits move into a fresh, but slightly earthy finish.  Light menthol, lime, grapefruit.  There's also dried leather, pine. It's a touch creamy at the end. Lingers for quite a while with the brighter citrus.

Thoughts: Sitting down with a glass of this reminds me that I have had very little from this house that is younger than 40 years of age, and I've tasted quite a bit at this point.  The 46° doesn't taste young, though. It just doesn't taste old, if that makes sense.  There are some dimensions that come only with the extra rest in oak that aren't present here, but what that leaves us with is a very drinkable, fresh and expressive cognac with a focus on fruits.  Nothing wrong with that! It is full of flavor, with good presence in mouthfeel, and a finish that lasts.  I think this is the best value I’ve found in cognac.  Available overseas for around $70.

Very Solid B+

Sunday, October 21, 2018

Jacques Denis Millesime 1994 47%


It amazes me how many small cognac houses are sprinkled throughout the French countryside. I think its one of the reasons why non-French consumers get lost – with so many options, where is a beginner to start? Sure, there are “best-of” and “top ten” and “must buy” lists, but those are about as reliable as the cable guy showing up on time. More often than not, I rely on my nerd friends as a tasting and recommendation crutch. Unfortunately, cognac, and especially small house cognac, is a relative wasteland when it comes to booze-nerd research (except in Scandinavia – those peeps know what’s up when it comes to cognac). So, we’re here to help nerds!

Here’s another review of a small house cognac with a very small footprint.

Jacques Denis is located in Grande Champagne. They produce a couple of bottlings, mostly geared towards generic, brand-centric marketing, with this 1994 single vintage sitting as an outlier among the rest of the pack. If you’ve read some of my other posts (or know your business when it comes to cognac), you’ll know that there are some extra hoops that come along with vintage dating a cognac (thanks to the BNIC). The fact that JD went the extra length to vintage date this tells me that 1994 must have been an exceptional harvest for them – I mean, it is the same year we got Coolio’s “Fantastic Voyage,” so it makes sense.

Nose: a nice bouquet of sweets and fruits pop, with caramel, pears, apples, a little tangerine, and Smarties (confectionery sugar candy)

Palate: the sweets and fruits fully translate to the palate along with some other notes, including green grape skins, light coffee (not dark and bitter but bright and fruity beans), sweet cream (think half-n-half), and roasted pecan.

Finish: Nice medium length that washes over the tongue and lingers for a nice

Thoughts: this is tasty and I have no regrets picking it up. The bottle itself wasn’t too expensive, either (around $125 pre-ship), but as its always the case, it’s the shipping from Europe that is hits below the belt. I think that the 1994 is unique enough where some people would really be into it. I’m a fan – not obsessive, buying every obscure Japanese-only release type of fan…I’d say that that I’m glad I bought a ticket to the concert.

Grade: Solid B+

Website: http://cognacjacquesdenis.com/page/propriete

Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Calvados Morin Napoleon 25 ans, 43%

Ryan's Notes
 



Calvados Morin Napoleon 25 ans, 43%






This is a Calvados from Morin. Morin has been around for awhile, dating back to 1889 in the Risle Valley in Normandy, before their production was ultimately moved to Ivry-la-Bataille in the Eure valley where it continues today. Eaux-de-vie is aged in 300-400 liter Limousin oak casks. This particular Calvados has been aged for 25 years and was bottled at 43%.

Nose: it’s an immediately sweet nose of candied apples, candy corn, caramel. Remember circus peanuts? Light touches of tobacco leaves, sawdust, and gentle spices.

Taste:  It seems silly to say, but apple cider comes to mind.  Moving on from the obvious.  Poached spiced pears. Cherry. Chocolate caramel. Dark honey. Elderberry syrup. The right kind of medicinal here.  Y’know, the good quality cough syrup. We get a little bit of the oak coming through here now with some cooking spices - cinnamon, peppercorns. Some light polish notes.

Thoughts: It is perfect at 43% with a rich mouthfeel and long finish. The aroma had me wondering if this was going to be a bit heavy handed in the fruit sugars, but it showed some extra dimension on the palate. A very compelling spirit, overall.  Available overseas from the whisky exchange (if they still ship to your state) for around $115. Recommended.

It's a strong B+

Monday, October 8, 2018

1983 Du Chateau De Lacaze 46%

Ryan's Notes








Tasting a 1983 vintage armagnac from Lacaze. There is not a ton of info available on this house. There seems to have been a small handful of vintages bottled for Master of Malt and Howells of Bristol. From what I can gather, this particular vintage was bottled in 1996 for Howells of Bristol in the UK. Who is Howells of Bristol, you ask? No clue.  Bottled at 46%.

Nose: It's fresh. No dense oak notes to sort through. This is very straightforward, but in a good way.

Fruits. Bright melon stands out. Floral and aromatic. Sandalwood.  Never overwhelming the sweetness, though.

Taste: Immediately sweet. Strawberry, golden raisins, melon. Honey. Very lively.

Finish: The finish transitions cleanly from the sweet fruits into some light oak notes. Menthol, damp oak, some sharp spice; gentian, cinnamon. Nice length.

Overall: This is a very nice youthful armagnac.  It has the freshness that I really enjoy and it is very clean. A nice array of fruits with a lasting finish that carries through with some lighter oak influence. It certainly has me chasing the next sip even if it isn't terribly complex. I’m curious to try an expression with a touch more age on it, but wouldn't mind having a bottle of this on the shelf at the right price.

B

Saturday, September 22, 2018

Vallein-Tercinier "Lot 90" and "Lot 70" for Flask, T5C, and Ryan


Ryan's Notes



Two Vallein-Tercinier selections brought to the states

Just to echo Justin, this was the clear choice for us when we tasted through the samples.  After tasting it that first time over a year ago, my memory of it became more an impression than any true recollection of what it tasted like.  Thrilled to finally be able to open a bottle and dive in.  The Lot 90, was my second favorite of the samples, but very different than the others. At the time of tasting I was completely set on the Lot 70, but now having a bottle in front of me I'm so glad that this one was picked up by Flask Fine Wine.






Lot 70, Petite Champagne, 52% (Selection for Flask, T5C, and Ryan)

Nose: Caramel, dense stewed fruits - peaches, berries. Leather bound books, walnuts, tobacco leaves. Fragrant oak. Eucalyptus.

Taste:  Lots of juicy fruits right up front. Ripe and syrupy. Blueberries, raspberries. Cream. Tastes like sweet berry pie. Also stone fruits - peaches. A heavy wave of wood polish, dried leather, linseed oil. Pleasantly drying.  There are some hints of brighter fruits. Papaya. 

Finish: Intense on the walnut oil. Black tea tannins. Spiced fruits. 

Overall: Layers upon layers.  This is, to me, an example of excellent oak influence over 45+ years.  The heavier oak flavors fill out the richer fruits on the palate, but it's still showing a freshness that is amazing for its age.  There's also a dryness and pungency, but it's pleasing and not overpowering.  I think it’s an outstanding spirit.



Lot 90, Grande Champagne, 49.7% (Selection for Flask)

Nose: Fruit forward. Apples and pears. Honey glazed. Lightly spiced. Apple cider. There's some gentle smoke there, as well.

Taste:  More orchard fruits. Apples, pears. But also some tropical fruits. Guava, papaya. Sweet and jammy. Wildflower honey. Melted spiced chocolate. Slightly malty.

Finish: More spiced fruits, mild oak tannins. Candied ginger.

Overall: It’s youthful in the best way possible. Falls just a touch short in the slight finish, but we're nitpicking. This is a delicious cognac.  

Sunday, September 16, 2018

Vallein Tercinier “Lot 70” Petite Champagne 52% for Flask, T5C, and Ryan


I’m going to preface this review with saying that I helped set up this pick and I’m inherently biased. Instead of giving it a grade, I'll just say that it’s a great cognac and I wouldn’t be upset if I bought one at retail (Flask has some available).

On to the review…

Vallein Tercinier is a grower / producer and their business goes all the back to the 1850s with George Vallein, who created and sold cognac blends. The family and company history is outlined on their website (link below) and worth a read. Today, Robert Tercinier handles the production side of cognac production and Catherine Roudier-Tercinier along with her husband, Stephane Roudier, handle the commercial side of the brand. Vallein Tercinier is located in Grande Champagne but produces cognac from other regions and I suspect they source some of the grapes from various vineyards (however they may own vineyards in different regions, too).

Unfortunately, the United States is limited when it comes to unadulterated, cask strength cognac. When I reached out to Stephane from Vallein Tercinier, I was ecstatic when he agreed to work with us. Stephane sent us several delicious samples and the Lot 70 was a clear standout (I will say the Lot 90 was pretty fantastic, too). While Vallein Tercinier uses the term “Lot,” it really refers to the vintage year (see my “Vintage” blog post), so the Lot 70 was distilled in 1970. Let that sink in…this is a 48 year cognac. Incredible. The Lot 70 is unchill-filtered, uncolored, and unadulterated. Pure, raw, 48 year old cognac...

Nose: brown sugar, apricots, and oak, oh my…some cigar box, too.

Palate: milk chocolate, tea and dried tobacco leaves wash over the palate, then I get apricots, blackberries, under-ripe raspberries, flower stems, walnut oil and some light trop fruit notes…some oak but far from over-oaked.

Finish: nice length with the fruit notes slowly tapering off last.

Thoughts
I love this – it’s a conversion cognac for spirits geeks who have always shunned or ignored brandy. I think if we saw more cognac like this in the States, its popularity would explode. The bottle has definitely evolved with a little airtime and I look forward to seeing where it takes me.           

https://www.cognac-tercinier.com/en/domaine-des-forges-en/500-years-of-history

Sunday, September 9, 2018

1979 L'encantada Domaine Les Bidets 38 years old, 48.3%

Ryan's Notes




1979 L'encantada Domaine Les Bidets 38 years old, 48.3%



Another L'encantada, another domaine.  A 1979 vintage armagnac bottled at 48.3%.  I don't know much about Les Bidets, other than that I believe we are looking at a small grower of Baco vineyards in Arthez-d'Armagnac who has their armagnac produced by a traveling distiller.  So, 100% baco here. Unfiltered and cask-strength, of course.  There has been a number of vintage casks released over recent years by L'encantada, but this does seem to be one of the older ones.


Nose: The nose immediately reveals its age. Tobacco leaves, dirt, hint of burnt wood, under all the dark oaky flavors there are some syrupy sugars and thick stewed fruits - cherries, plums. 

Taste: The first thing that hits me is a deep richness. Dark honey with a medicinal kick.  Cherry cough syrup.  Both thick and heavy on the palate.

Finish: Warm spice, ginger stands out.  Gentian and some other pleasantly astringent herbal notes.  Dry oak, a touch of varnish, just bordering on woody. The finish is long with dark sugars and dry oak.

With water: The nose reveals much of the same, but on the palate it swims well! Right away there is more sweetness. The dark honey sugars aren't overtaken as quickly and the fruit has more of a presence.  Less medicinal, not that I mind it. The cherries are still there, but now there are plums, and hints of citrus. Caramel and chocolate. Nuts. This is, in fact, quite a different experience.

At cask strength the denser oak notes remind me of some of those old rye whiskies - think Hirsch 22, BMH 23.  Of course, it's still undeniably brandy.  I imagine some will absolutely love this one at strength.  With water, we see it open up and reveal a bit more sweetness.  My preference is towards the latter, but this is the beauty of getting a spirit bottled at natural strength. Choose your own adventure.  $215 at Astor Wines.

B+



Friday, August 24, 2018

Brillet Tres Rare "Heritage" Grande Champagne 45% Brut de Frut

Brillet is a small family-owned grower/producer located in Grande Champagne. Their vineyard is 150 acres and the property runs into the Petite Champagne growing region. They have been around since the 1600s and that is about it. Their website says “a refreshed website is coming” and has a picture of their estate (which looks gorgeous by the way). I wonder how long the refresh has been in the works, and given the patience of cognac producers, how long are we going to have to wait?

I found the Heritage for a little over $250 online so I gathered a couple friends and we did a bottle split. A 50-year-old cognac at (or near cask strength) for $250sh – sign me up! A few commercial reviewers gave the Heritage a little love…Paul Pacult gave it 5 stars…Wine Enthusiast gave it a 96-100pts and said it smelled of marzipan and tasted like dark caramel, vanilla, butter, and cream. I love marzipan, dark caramel, vanilla, butter, and cream! What could go wrong?

So on to the review…

Nose: musty oak, salt water taffy, blackberry jam, and some faint floral notes in the background

Taste: rich and dark, the caramel is definitely there but not intense, sweet crème, fudge, candied pecans, some of that dark chocolate bitterness, and some light earthen-like qualities (think leather but I really hate saying leather cause who eats leather?)

Finish: beautifully long

Thoughts
It’s good. I might have to snag one or two for the bunker. I used a Lheraud I gave an A minus for benchmarking and comparison. I slightly preferred the palate for the Lheraud but the finish on the Brillet is fantastic…and both are great overall. With that in mind, I’ll give this an…

Grade: A minus

Thursday, August 23, 2018

Lhéraud 1974/2018 Grande Champagne 49% - 44 years old

Ryan's Notes






Ryan's Review

Well, here we have another Lhéraud. A continually impressive house, both in their stunning vintage bottles, as well as the excellent XO Charles VII blend. Price on these vintage selectiosn is high, but so far the quality has continued to match the price. When Justin shared the 1974 vintage he had open I was a big fan and so decided to seek out another '74. This one was bottled just in February of this year, making it about 44 years old. Bottled at 49%.

Nose: Immediately rich nose, almost port-like. We have honey and plums. There's some heavier notes of tobacco and coffee. Old books and a little bit of polished oak.

Taste: Quite like the nose. Peaches and plums. Blueberry. Sweet citrus. Cream. Moves into a heavy coffee liqueur. Thick wildflower honey seems to coat the whole palate.

Finish: Delicate herbal bitters - propolis stands out. Bee pollen. A resinous quality to the flavors, it's almost medicinal. But, this is good, it's very good. Smoked spices. Orange zest. Some wood polish.  Nectar-like sweetness lingers throughout the finish.

This is an impeccable spirit. Great balance of sweetness and all those complex herb and spice notes.  I'm showing my bias here, but I just love when an old spirit is able to showcase the cask without becoming astringent and woody.  Some of these older cognacs do it very well. Lively on the palate, and the finish is a highlight. It is not tired by any stretch, and tastes as if it could have spent another 40 years in the cask. 


A

Sunday, August 19, 2018

L'Encantada Domaine "Le Freche" 1988 29 Year 52%


L’Encantada is sprawling right now, both in geographical distribution and producers bottled. Here’s a 29 year “Le Freche” that was bottled for Lincoln Road in Mississippi (great store and owner by the way). The label has the word "Domaine" before Le Freche – from my understanding Le Freche is an area located in the Armagnac region (wiki calls it a “commune” which is analogous to a township or municipality). SKU’s old site shows multiple producers producing in the “Le Freche” area (link below), so I guess when L’Encantada puts “Le Freche” on the bottle it could come from any one of several sources.

On to the review…

Nose: unmistakably Armagnac…ripe grapes and oak…hazelnut, cherry, and some baking spices

Palate: oak, caramel, grapes, and raisins…a little effervescent and cherry cola-like...then some light pink grapefruit and white chocolate in the background

Finish: great finish with great length…just lingers for minutes.

Thoughts

This is fantastic Armagnac. Everyone gets caught up with the Pibous, but I like this more than most of the Pibous I’ve had. It has one foot in bourbon and the other foot in heavily-sherried scotch (like a Glendronach single cask). Like I said before, it’s unmistakably Armagnac but I also feel like this one has mass appeal. Great job with this one L’Encantada (and Lincoln Road). This is an easy…

Grade: A minus

http://recenteats.blogspot.com/2016/01/armagnac-producers.html

Wednesday, July 25, 2018

Lheraud 1975 Petite Champagne 47% ~30 year


Here’s a 1975 Lheraud from Petite Champagne. It may seem like I am prone to hyperbole when it comes Lheraud, but I don’t think its hyperbole by any measure. Lheraud is some of, if not “the” best cognac producer. Arguably, of course. But I wouldn’t want to be the person arguing against Lheraud – it’d be like arguing the Beatles weren’t the greatest rock band of the 20th century. I'm all ears...

This guy is bottled at a respectable 47% and was bottled in 2005, so its around ~30 years old. I found it a while back with a cache of other older Lherauds that were lost in distro for years.

My notes

Nose: caramel, crème brulee, toasted marshmallow, figs, and a little chamomile tea in the background

Palate: silky, fat distillate where the crème brulee from the nose translates…It’s a little oaky but not over the top. There are also notes of brown sugar, (good) olive oil, raisins, and walnuts

Finish: nice medium length, not over or underwhelming.

Thoughts
Great stuff as usual. It doesn’t beat the 74 Lheraud from Grande Champagne but it’s still great cognac. If you are looking for a more rich, decadent profile cognac, Lheraud is your man.

Grade: A minus

A smattering of Château Pomès-Pébérère reviews...


Ryan's Review:

So a spread of samples from Château Pomès-Pébérère from the Ténarèze region in Gers en Gascogne.  A quick search online shows this is a small house with less than 100 acres of vineyard. Primarily growing Ugni-Blanc and Colombard, these two grapes make up 90% of their blends. Their eaux-de-vie is aged in 400 liter French oak. These are relatively available and priced well. Often times I find that I know my feelings on a dram well before I’ve reached the end of 2 ounces. It is interesting that I found myself pushing the end of each of these samples

1966, 42%

Nose: A surprisingly fresh aroma. A little juicy. Sweet honey. Dusty books.
Taste: It’s very clean. Dark honey upfront.  A nice spread of stewed fruit. Apples, orange marmalade, plums.  It does show its age, though. Tobacco, leather, light touch of lacquer and walnut bitters, a bit of spiciness pushing through in the finish.
Overall: A clean and dry armagnac, but the oak is surprisingly in check. What we have instead is a really nice mix of cooked fruits and denser oak notes. Really well done. This held up very nicely.

B+/A- territory. But let’s go with A-.

1968, 42%

Nose: Immediately dry and earthy on the nose. Old leather books. Plums. Szechuan and some dry spices from the oak.
Taste: Deep plum notes, but the fruit doesn’t really pop if you know what I mean. There’s more leather and a heavy minerality.  Chocolate and raisins. It’s a darker profile, for sure.
Finish: Sawdust, oak spices, tobacco. Polished oak. Finishes quite dry.
Overall: This one sticks to the trend of clean and tight, but it’s a bit more tired and heavy, and just a tad less fun. Still very enjoyable, though.

B

1975, 42%

Nose: Sweet florals. Tangerines, cherries. Caramel. Some wood varnish and dry spice.
Taste: A similar progression on the palate. A nice spread of fruits. Raisins, cherry, plum.  Honey dipped apples. Moving into the earthier notes of walnuts, gentian, wormwood. But mixed in with those herbal bitters we also have a buttery chocolate note. Spices push through. Mainly cinnamon. 
Overall: In an interesting way the highlight is the oak in all of its complexities. There is an almost herbal liqueur nature to this one with the balance of bitters and sweetness, chocolates and spices. It’s a dense armagnac, but also very refined. Lovely stuff.

Again B+/A- territory, with a nudge towards the A-.

Tuesday, June 5, 2018

St. Remy Authentic VSOP 40%


Ryan's Review

A couple things.  First, Justin and I consider this blog a journal of sorts. A written document on our path to discover what brandy is both in taste and in production. It shouldn’t be a secret that we don’t consider ourselves experts. If you see a piece of information that is incorrect please let us know. We also don’t expect our notes to be taken as gospel.  We occasionally will taste something expensive, and we may or may not love it.  Hopefully if you choose to purchase it based on our review it’s because you’ve found your palate seems to agree with ours more often than not.  In the end, we are just charting our own experiences in discovering what the world of brandy has to offer.  Second, it is probably a bit obvious by now that Justin and I have similar tastes and cherry pick the brandies that we have tasted and reviewed on this page.  We look for bottles, often from small production, family-run houses and producers who focus on letting the unadulterated spirit do the talking.   Most of what we have tasted so far we have enjoyed to varying degrees, even if it might not be a repeat purchase or a “wow” spirit. We assign grades because it’s part of the shtick, and I suppose it does help categorize in my own mental library what my overall impressions of the spirit are. With grades in mind, let’s remember even the bottles that we grade a B are still fine spirits. Maybe it doesn’t fall right in our wheelhouse, maybe not a “run out and tell the masses” bottle, but still, we can recognize there is quality.   So with all that said, here today is a bottle that was not cherry-picked. Instead, I found this bottle in a box in my basement collecting dust. I purchased it a couple years ago for a cooking recipe for no other reason than it was cheap. Cheap doesn’t always mean bad, though.

Some interesting details on the brand. St. Remy was formed in 1886 and is owned by the juggernaut company, Remy Cointreau.  It is not actually a cognac, as the grapes are not grown in the Cognac region. Instead, the grapes that are used are coming from some other areas very popular for their vineyards, such as Burgundy, Champagne, Bordeaux, and Rhone Valley.  So they refer to their end product as French Brandy, which is governed by the Federation of French Brandy. 

St. Remy Authentic VSOP
40%

Nose: A very light nose, with some hints of sweet fruits.

Taste: Quite sugary up front with honey, grapes, and strawberries. It is a bright profile, and just a tad spirity. 

Finish: Towards the finish is more light summer fruits and some spices. A hint of cocoa. It finishes with light menthol and oak.

Overall: This is a rather light brandy, and you get the sense that is exactly what they’re going for, both from the proof and also the overall blend. It is neither offensive nor complex, and the flavors come and go rather quickly. It is not an overly sweet presentation, however the sweetness it provides is simple and without much else to round it out and make it interesting. A good brandy perhaps to use in a cocktail or in cooking. 

C+

Monday, June 4, 2018

1986 L'Encantada Bas Armagnac 30 Year Old "Domaine Le Frêche" Cask #44


Ryan's Review

We’re tasting another bottling from L’Encantada today. This one is a 1986 vintage labeled as “Domaine Le Frêche”. Well, I know next to nothing about the origin of this armagnac, other than that it was produced in the domaine Le Frêche located in the Bas Armagnac region. It was brought in by K&L and this will actually be the first L’encantada bottling I’ve had the pleasure of tasting that is not a Lous Pibous. This one is 30 years old and bottled at a natural 47.9%.

1986 L'Encantada Bas Armagnac 30 Year Old "Domaine Le Frêche" Cask #44

Nose: On the nose it’s quite big. Caramel and dried fruits make up the sweetness. We’ve also got cinnamon oil, smoke and leather.  The oak is certainly present.

Taste: Upfront we have stewed fruits and berries. Some leather. Quickly moving into heavy oak, caramelized brown sugar.  The mouthfeel here is quite chewy. Finishes with spicy cinnamon and fragrant wood. I find the oak to be a bit dominating on the finish only in that it seems to be overshadowing the rest of the profile.

I decided to take it for a swim and see what happens. With water the fruit notes open up with big notes of mango, heavy tart rhubarb and overripe strawberries. These transition to brighter fruits, like pineapple and lime. Quite crisp.  The fruits are backed by some deeper caramel and dense oak notes.  Some milk chocolate. Cinnamon. More fruit, tangerine this time. Again, there’s that fragrant wood, which is very nice. Layers upon layers. Complex and delicious.

Overall: This armagnac settled at a natural 47.9% at time of bottling, and reminds me of the heaviness of a Lous Pibous, making me wonder if it was aged in new oak. I find that a little bit of water unwraps the whole package and reveals layers of flavors beyond the caramel and oak that dominate at cask strength.  That mango note is a highlight for me. This is an excellent armagnac and the quality is high. Can we expect more of the same from other “Le Frêche” bottlings?

A-

Friday, June 1, 2018

Chateau de Pellehaut 1983 30 Year Armagnac 47.8%


Here's a review of an older K&L Pellehaut pick I snagged years ago. It's long gone and probably difficult to track down, but I hope the review speaks to the overall quality of the Pellehaut releases, and especially the K&L Pellehaut picks. For as much fun as it is to joke about David Driscoll's silly wrestling analogies (like I should cast stones, amiright?), Driscoll and David OG at K&L tracked down some fantastic brandy before anyone else. I bought into the hype early, right when they first started selling store-exclusive Armagnac. I'm sure Charles Neal, the author and importer, had a heavy hand in what K&L brought Stateside, too.

Anyways, this is a 30 year, 1983 Chateau de Pellehaut, bottled in 2013 at 47.8%. It was ~$85 when it was first released...almost seems too soon to say "those were the days" when referring to 2013...

Nose: grape mocha latte (I wish that was an actual thing), lots of oak, more oak, and citrus...some rose petals and a tinge of sea spray, too

Taste: fat and juicy AND rich, I told my buddy this tasted like Glendronach and dusty bourbon had a love child...the oak isn't as prevalent as it is on the nose, but its there...chocolate, backing/confectionery spices, and a light cheesecake note (I use that to describe a pleasant, subtle rich sourness)...citrus, cherry, caramel, and apricots

Finish: nice length, where the fruits and spices taper off slowly

Thoughts
I really like this, and I really really like this for ~$85. When I first opened the bottle, the 83 was good, but I wasn't a huge fan. Now, about halfway towards empty (around 4 months air time), it has has really opened up. While its a nice fat spirit, I do wish there was a little more oomph - that would drive it up another grade. Like I said at the beginning, while this bottle is gone, I think it's indicative of Pellehaut's overal quality.

Grade: A minus
  

Original Retail Linke







Wednesday, May 30, 2018

2004 L’Encantada Lous Pibous Cask 196 56%

Updated for your reading pleasure...

Here’s another L’Encantada review. There’s no shortage of these reviews because there is no shortage of L’Encantada in the States, or at least, that's how is appears to me. So far, L’Encantada has been the most reviewed bottler on this blog. There have only been a handful of selections by private groups and a few Stateside stores so far (around 7 or 8 barrel picks), but more bottles are slated for touchdown in various markets soon, and really, everyone in the American brandy nerd / community groups seems to be enjoying L’Encantada these days...just head over to the Facebook groups or google L’Encantada review...there's no dearth of coverage, discussion, or reviews.

Before I get to the review, I had a few thoughts I wanted to jot down. The first is that I think L’Encantada is taking advantage of the American brandy desert by selling unique, single cask brandies. Not many brandy producers are selling the same product Stateside and I think by and large, L’Encantada's popularity is the result of filling a gaping-wide hole in the American brandy market. There are some other bottlers on American shelves, but there are questions as to sources of distillate, whether its true cask strength, whether it's colored, etc...questions that make spirits geeks waffle on spending $100+ on a particular bottle. What L’Encantada brings to the table is the most transparent brandy available in America.

Which brings me to my second thought, which is that I think L’Encantada, a small, independent bottler, has taken the right approach to selling spirits in the US market, one that has allowed them to flourish and grow in popularity. I believe that L’Encantada's approach could serve as a model for other, small brandy bottlers and producers.

Now, let me elaborate on what I mean by "approach" and "model" because there was some confusion as to what I was trying to convey on my initial draft, likely as a result of trying to pound out a quick post and speaking too generally...After initially attempting to enter the American market with little to no interest, L’Encantada, was approached by a small group of whiskey geeks about purchasing a cask. The purchase was run through a boutique liquor store which also purchased some L’Encantada-bottled brandy. From there, other groups and stores have started working with L’Encantada, and more bottles are on the way (or at least in the works). L’Encantada is developing a great reputation by working with a private groups and boutique liquor stores - the nerds are getting their hands on good brandy and sharing it with people, which is drumming up more curiosity and interest in L’Encantada. It's a form of grassroots marketing that costs L’Encantada nothing, really…and now when a store gets a L’Encantada pick, it sells out instantly…if a group pick hits secondary, it flips for double the initial cost.

So when I talk about  L’Encantada's "approach," or their "model" (which appears to be more incidental than intentional based on conversations with people possessing intimate knowledge of L’Encantada's operations), what I am saying is that rather than spending a significant amount of money on marketing and focusing on portfolio-specific products, small brandy producers or bottlers could instead work with private spirits groups and boutique liquor stores, sell unique products (i.e single casks, special blends, etc.), and churn up demand for their products...if you have a good distillate, let the nerds be your marketing mouthpiece. Ultimately, I think  L’Encantada is showing that working with private groups and stores can be a successful approach to selling bottles in the American market as opposed to taking other, more traditional approaches to increasing demand.

One caveat I want to point out (which is purely subjective and solely based on my opinion) is that working with private groups before stores might be the best course of action. Aside from vetting the quality of a particular spirit before selecting it, the groups are entrenched in the spirits community and are in the best position to speak to the community about the spirit's quality. Surely there will always be bias, but people tend to lend more credibility to information from someone hyping something not for sale (i.e. private group picks) as opposed to someone hyping something they are trying to sell (i.e. store picks). I have seen more than a few store-picked brandies just languish on shelves. Plus, L’Encantada initially approached a store and was turned away...it was the nerds (also known as consumers) that got the ball rolling!

I hope that brings some clarity to what I was originally trying to say. With that in mind...

Here is a review of a 2004 L’Encantada Lous Pibous Cask 196 56%. The bottle was selected by the Brandy Brothers. I initially wrote that it was selected by 1789b but apparently it's a Brandy Brother's pick (its worth mentioning the selecting group was essentially all 1789b members and cask 196 was pretty much sold exclusively to 1789b members...take it for what it is). The label has “by Philippe” handwritten on it, and from the 1789b member who is responsible for initially bringing L'Encantada Stateside: "Pibous is the domain that grew the grapes, made the wine and aged the Armagnac. They did not do the distillation. They hired a travelling distiller/still from the town of Condom. 1993 and later Pibous was distilled by Philippe..."

On to the review...

Nose: strawberry jello and beef stock…apples, amaretto, and a little Robitussin cough syrup

Taste: this is meaty – is that you, Mortlach??? This really has a lot of sherried Mortlach qualities with plenty of beef bullion, brine/salt and a little sulfur…some mineral qualities (slate) and somewhat jammy, with some cherries in there...I also get some medicinal qualities – I’ll call it cough syrup

Finish: nice length with the finish…the Mortlachyness meaty/salty character dominates the end

Thoughts
When I first opened this I absolutely adored it (probably because I adore sherried Mortlach) and I embarked to get more. At that time it was a clear “A” to me. Then a week later I revisited the bottle for an official review and it was as if someone turned on the lights at the bar...at 2am – oh boy...with air and time the flavors amplified, and instead of working in harmony when I first opened it, they were in an ugly battle for palate domination. Cask 196 is not bad by any stretch, just to me, it’s not very balanced. I’ve heard that this is a polarizing pick, which makes sense. I also see why it was picked – it's very unique. So please remember this is just one man’s perspective and I’m sure there are many others. With that in mind, I’m giving this a…

Grade: B

Thursday, May 24, 2018

Cognac Barrels


There are plenty of resources on the web about whisky barrels, but when it comes to cognac barrels, I couldn’t find a one-stop shop that provided all of the information I was looking for – even the BNIC website had some informational gaps. A lot of sites were pretty helpful, though, and this post is the result of cobbling together information from various sites and creating that one-stop shop for your cognac barrel information needs. I hope this post is an evolving piece since I don’t know everything about cognac barrels and more knowledgeable people will (hopefully) chime in to keep us informed and honest.

The Law
The AOC regulations and law regarding cognac can be found in the Decree n ° 2009-1146 of September 21st, 2009 relating to the controlled label of origin "Cognac" or "Brandy of Cognac" or "Brandy of the Charentes" (the link is provided below).

Article 3, Paragraph D, Subparagraph 9 of the regulations state that "spirits intended for direct human consumption shall be aged in an oak container for a minimum period of two years."

  • The use of the term “oak” is a generic term. Article 3, Paragraph E, Subparagraph 4 ("Ageing") states that "the Tronçais or Limousin type oak ("oak" or "pedunculate" according to the uses) was chosen because of its capacity to allow for long periods the exchanges between brandy, the external environment and the wood. . The numerous cooperage companies that have developed in the geographical area have been able, in close relationship with Cognac winemakers, to build know-how in the development of the most suitable housing for the aging of Cognac. It is up to the cellar masters to select the most suitable dwellings, according to the initial characteristics of the new brandies, the aging stage and its qualitative objectives". When the regulations discuss Tronçais or Limousin type oak (along with some online articles), they indicate that cognac casks have traditionally made from French oak, but there is also no outright prohibition on using any type of oak, really, and the primary use of French oak appears to be more of a general trade practice. As proof, Bache Gabrielsen released a cognac aged in virgin Tennessee oak, which was allowed to be called cognac.
  • In the past, the law may have prevented aging cognac in re-use casks, or at least it was frowned upon (?). Currently, the regulations do not address using re-use oak casks, and it appears that cognac can be aged in oak casks that previously held grape-based wines and spirits. On the web, there are several sites addressing Pierre Ferrand’s discovery of an early 20th century document showing cognac can be aged in wine casks (or at least that the practice used to be allowed). There are now several wine cask finished cognacs on the market, such as the Pierre Ferrand Renegade Barrel No. 1 which is finished in a Sauternes wine cask, as well as the Courvoisier’s Sherry Cask Finish Cognac, which was finished in a sherry wine cask.
  • An oak cask that previously held non-grape based wine or spirit, such as bourbon or scotch, cannot be used to age cognac. Again, there are no regulations addressing this and it appears to be a trade practice or tacit understanding among cognac makers. Martel recently released Blue Swift, which is a VSOP cognac that was finished in bourbon casks. If you look at the very bottom of the front label it states “Eau de Vie de Vin,” which is intended to mean it’s not technically cognac (even though it says cognac on the upper part of the label…I know). Deceptively clever labels aside, if a cognac is aged in a cask that contained non-grape aged wine or spirits, it cannot be called cognac.

I guess to distill down the law of cognac casks into one sentence, “cognac must be aged in oak casks, either new oak casks or oak casks previously containing only grape-based wine or spirits” (yes, I’m quoting myself here).

One takeaway regarding the law is that if there isn't a direct statement prohibiting a particular practice, it seems like trade norms dictate whether a practice is allowable (such as using re-use wine casks) or impermissible (such as using re-use bourbon/scotch casks). I think the use of re-use wine casks was able to sneak into permissible usage because (1) cognac is aged in both virgin oak and re-use barrels that previously held cognac, (2) a prohibition on all re-use casks would prevent cognac from being aged in second fill cognac casks, and (3) being a grape distillate, cognac and wine are in the same family, and I think some clever producers used similarities and semantics to their advantage.   

The Main Types of Oak
This is an area that has tripped me up for a while because people refer to geographical regions as if they are tree varietals, different scientific names are used for the same types of trees, etc. So hopefully this provides some clarity…

Even though the law allows for cognac to be aged in any variety of oak cask(s), cognac is traditionally a tale of two oaks: Tronçais and Limousin. When people talk about Tronçais and Limousin, they are technically not referring to a type of oak, but rather, the region from where the oak trees were sourced.

Region: Tronçais (pronounced “tron-say”)
The forest of Tronçais is a French national forest which is located in Allier - practically the center of France. In regard to oak trees, 73% of the forest is comprised of Sessile oak (Quercus Sessiliflora / Quercus Petraea) and 8% is comprised of Pedunculated oak (Quercus robur). The Office Nationale des Forets (“ONF”) manages the forest of Tronçais and also handles the sale of oak within the forest (along with replanting trees and addressing sustainability issues). The oak trees sold to coopers (both wine and cognac barrel coopers) tend to be very old, easily over 100 years in age. Coopers can bid on particular trees and usually purchase the oak trees several years before use. The ONF cuts and processes the oak trees and retains the timber on behalf of the coopers for several years to allow for sufficient air seasoning time (up to 3 years).



Region: Limousin (pronunciation “lee-mo-sen”)
The forests from several regions of western France are generally considered the Limousin region, to include the eastern part of the departments of Deux-Sevres, Vienne, Hautes de Vienne, the northern part of the Correze, the Creuze, the eastern part of the Charente and the southern part of the Indre; the area is pretty close in proximity to the Cognac region. A majority of the oak trees in this region are Pedunculated Oak (Quercus Robur) and many of the woods in this region are also managed by the ONF.


Actual types of oak used for cognac cask making

• Sessile Oak (Quercus Sessiliflora / Quercus petraea / Quercus Rouvre) – wood from this tree is generally tightly-grained and softer for an oak.


• Pedunculated Oak (Quercus Robur) - wood from this tree tends to have wider grain than Sessile Oak and it imparts more tannin into the spirit. According to some sites, these oak trees impart vanilla notes into the cognac.


Do the differences in species matter? That depends. What I’ve found is that coopers do not usually distinguish the two species of wood in their workshops and instead pay more attention to forest location and grain size than oak species. However; the forests of Tronçais and Limousin generally contain different types oak trees, so species overlap in cask making is likely not an issue. Further, most cognac producers prefer the use Limousin oak due to the heavier tannins imparted from the oak (it also probably helps, or at least plays a role, that Limousin is close to the Cognac region).

To summarize, Tronçais and Limousin are not oak types but regions where specific types of oak trees grow; Sessile Oak is the predominate oak in Tronçais and Pedunculated Oak is the predominate oak in Limousin. Sessile Oak is tight-grained and Pedunculated Oak is wide-grained and imparts more tannin into the spirit.

Cooperages and Barrel Details



Called the “tonnellerie” in French, there are a lot of cooperages that produce barrels for cognac producers. Wine and the use of French oak is big business so there is no shortage of barrel makers in France (some even have a footprint in the USA!). There are plenty of small and mid-size cooperages, and some of the big houses have their own cooperages, too. For example, Hennessy has a “barrel-making factory.” There are also barrel brokers where producers can purchase barrels made by different coopers.

There are no restrictions on barrel size for cognac, and the norms seem to be 350 liters or 500 liters. However, don’t be surprised by other barrel sizes if you come across them (unlike scotch, they don’t have goofy names for the different barrel sizes)…some cognacs spend time in gigantic vats, tuns, or whatever the producer decides to call it.

One of the big differences between cognac barrels and whisky barrels is that cognac barrels are “toasted” rather than charred. Just like charring, toasting is a process that burns the inside of a barrel to a desired point to mellow the wood tannins and raw oak flavors. Toasting is on the lighter end of the burning spectrum and helps release vanillin from the cellulose in the wood and imparts spicy, vanilla notes. There are degrees of toasting, from light to heavy, and the stronger the toast the more the barrel flavors are present. Separate from barrel charring, which further mellows interaction between tannins and the spirit, barrel toasting allows for more interaction between the wood tannin and spirit. Not all cognac producers use a toast; Daniel Bouju uses a char and it’s easy to see that use in the dark color of his cognac. If you’re more interesting in the science of toasting check out some of the cooperage sites I listed below (like Vicard Tonnelleries).

 (radiation toasting)

 (toasting vs. charring)

Effect of Wood on Cognac
Below is a chart on the coloring of cognac. Obviously it’s just a generalization because toast (or char) level as well as cask type are going to play a role in how quickly the cask affects the spirit. Surprisingly, it does not take very long to gain color which is mainly due to new oak casks being used for the first few years of cognac aging (I’ll dive into that topic on another post about aging).


Summary
This post is just about cognac barrels and I’ll write another piece about ageing in the future. The main takeaways that I think are important are: (1) cognac casks must be made from oak, (2) re-use casks can be used only if they held wine or grape-based spirits, (3) Tronçais and Limousin are regions where oak trees are sourced for cognac casks, (4) cognac casks are generally 350 or 500 liters in size, and (5) cognac barrels are generally toasted but not always.

There are some interesting topics of discussion (like the Blue Swift label) that I’ll leave for the discussion groups (like Serious Brandy on Facebook).

UPDATE: A buddy provided me with the link with the actual AOC law and regulations for cognac. The link is provided below and I've updated the law section of this post.

Sources

AOC Regs for cognac (google translate): https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=en&prev=search&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=fr&sp=nmt4&u=https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/eli/decret/2009/9/21/AGRT0916772D/jo/texte/fr&xid=25657,15700022,15700124,15700149,15700168,15700186,15700189,15700190,15700201,15700205&usg=ALkJrhiwbtaibTcRKjLqxSsCohvBZJ_62w

The Law: http://www.cognac.fr/cognac/_ru/2_cognac/index.aspx?page=appellation

The Law: www.pediacognac.com

The Law (use of casks holding grape-based wines/spirits): https://troymedia.com/2018/05/07/understanding-cognac-global-market/

The Law (Blue Swift issue): https://blog.cognac-expert.com/martell-releases-blue-swift-vsop-bourbon-cask-finish/

Forrest of Tronçais: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forest_of_Tron%C3%A7ais

ONF Website: http://www.onf.fr/filiere_bois/@@index.html

Troncais Timber: http://seguinmoreaunapa.com/innovation/best-of-oak/

Limousin Oak (Germain-Robin): https://youtu.be/1xHWD45E6S4

More on wood: https://blog.cognac-expert.com/oak-barrel-cask-cognac-age-limousin/

More on wood: http://www.knoxbarrels.com/FAQ.html

Cooperages: http://www.alcademics.com/2009/10/a-cooperage-in-cognac.html

Cooperages (list of Coopers): http://www.bouchardcooperages.com/usa/products/products_intro.html

Cooperages: https://www.hennessy.com/en-gb/news/7842-barrel-making-factory

Toasting: http://seguinmoreaunapa.com/products/barrels/toast/

Toasting: http://www.bouchardcooperages.com/usa/products/vicard/vicard_intro.html

Toasting vs. Charring: http://www.winespectator.com/drvinny/show/id/52130

Charring: https://vinepair.com/wine-blog/what-are-barrel-char-levels-and-how-do-they-affect-the-way-my-whiskey-tastes/

BNIC Press Pack: http://www.cognac.fr/cognac/pdf/publications/dossier_en_07.pdf





Sunday, May 13, 2018

Eric Bordelet “Henri Bernard Beudin” 18yr Calvados 53%


This is another pickup I snagged on a whim a couple years ago…Instead of buying lotto scratch-offs, I purchase random bottles of booze I know nothing about. At least I can mix bad booze and hedge against a total loss, I guess. Anyways, Eric Bordelet is an apple dude and before buying this 18yr calvados I was familiar with his ciders (Normandy, France), which are really tasty. Bordelet sourced this cask from Henri Bernard Beudin. It was distilled in 1997 and aged in used Chenin Blanc barrels. I can’t find much info on HBB so I’m guessing he’s a small farm producer…probably doesn’t even have a Yelp or Facebook page! US distro for this bottle was through PM Spirits and Nicolas Palazzi. It was priced around $120 for a 375ml – ouch!

Eric Bordelet “Henri Bernard Beudin” 18yr Calvados 53%

Nose: Sweet apples pop along with a sourish acidic note (if that makes sense) and woody wood…confectionary sugar and candy, think smarties…some sweet floral notes like honeysuckle and a little floral undergrowth, stems and such

Palate: apples (obviously), but also pears and pear skin – the juicy Royal Verano pears from Harry and David gift baskets…the sourish note from the nose translates (I have no idea what to otherwise call it) along with powerful oak (jeeze, chill oak, chill)…a tart, candy-like quality lingers in the background 

Finish: the mouthfeel on this is velvety great and the great flavor lingers for a while…

Thoughts

When people say “it’s like comparing apples to oranges” around me, the saying doesn’t have its intended effect – I am incredibly partial to apples…It’s not even a contest. For what its worth, I ate an organic Fuji apple right before pouring this, to you know, set the mood. This 18 year old calvados tastes exactly like what you’d think good apple booze would taste like – it’s delicious. Naturally, I’m partial to it. I really am. I dig this, and, but for the oak, which is a little out of balance, it’d be an easy A. But, I can’t ignore the oak…and while I’m complaining, I’ll knock off some points for the price…so I’m giving this…

Grade: A Minus

Just because I gave this an A Minus doesn’t mean I’m not going to buy another bottle of this...If I can find one that is...

François Giboin Tres Vielles Borderies 43%


Ryan's Review

Today we’re tasting a coganc from François GIboin, a producer who is based in the Borderies region.  François is a producer grower, which means he doesn’t source his grapes, but picks from his own vineyards to go into his cognac production.  He has vineyards both in Borderies and Fins Bois, but his property, l’Hermitage, in Borderies is his home base, so to speak. L’Hermitage contains 13.5 hectares of vineyards and François is the sixth generation to be producing on the property.  11.5 hectares are reserved solely for Ugni Blanc growth.  He reserves the other 2 hectares for grapes used in pineau production.  He distills on lees in a copper pot still.  Only 20% of the production, about 7,000 bottles, is sold under the François Giboin label each year. The rest is reserved for further aging, pineau production, or is sold to Coirvoisier for blends. 

Much more can be read about his production here:

http://www.charlesnealselections.com/giboin.html

It’s a very informative and well-written post, and I recommend giving it a read.

The tasting notes below are for a 1974 Borderies. However, while this was distilled in 1974 and “bottled” in 2014, it was earlier moved from cask into demijohns where it sat for around a decade.  This bottle was purchased from Astor Wines, which states it is essentially 29 years old, an age that I’ve found to be a very nice sweet spot for many cognacs. There’s a label on the back of the bottle designating it as non-filtered. Always a good thing, right? This was bottled at 43%.

N: An immediately inviting nose. Oranges and cream.  Sweet honey, fruit juice.  There is some light oak there, as well.
T:  Immediately lively and juicy. Orange blossoms. Brown sugar. Thick honey.  Loads of sweet citrus. Nectarines and tangerines. Stone fruits, too. Plums. Some light florals. Buttery. Rich and fresh.
F: Cinnamon, some nuttiness, quite sweet still. Spiced cake comes to mind.  There’s also some oak pushing through in the very end. But it just balances out the whole package. This is an example of a cognac bottled at the right time, and at the right proof, I might add.

This cognac is like having a picnic in a meadow on a sunny day with a light breeze, a basket of fresh fruits and a jar of spiced honey to dip them in. Sorry, did you just groan a bit?  More to the point, it’s excellent cognac and highly drinkable. I think this bottle is no longer available from Astor Wines. I recall picking it up for around $130 when it was available. A zero regrets purchase.  There are other bottles of 1974 vintage floating around. I am not sure if there is much or any variation between them.

A-

Wednesday, May 9, 2018

Maison Surrenne Tonneau no.1 40% (bottled 2013)


This bottle is an old one…how old is anyone’s guess…but the label leads you on to believe that, at least from a price-to-age ratio, you’re getting a steal. Lucky, lucky you, Mr./Mrs. Consumer.

From the label: “Inconceivably rich. In 1922, Surrenne filled an oak tonneau with old petite champagne cognacs. Concerned about evaporation because the tonneau gets direct sun from the half-moon casement over the entry door, Surrenne’s successive cellar-masters topped the tonneau every year for 79 years, always with old petite champagne of very high quality. Never used, this rare solera-like blend contains a high proportion of cognac aged more than 100 years. From the Madame facility in Jarnac. Bottled unfiltered from tonneau no. August 19, 2013.

Cool.

Now if you’re wondering where this comes from, Maison Surrenne is Germain-Robin’s label for cognac sourced from Tiffon. I don’t know the history behind the name Maison Surrenne, but I imagine the pseudonym is similar to the use of alter-names in scotch world because of NDAs and brand protectionism (like “Speyside Distillery”).

Germain-Robin has been bottling the Tonneau no.1 for a while, starting around 2001. The earlier bottles were at or near cask strength (around ~42%), but for some reason in the early 2010s they brought it down to a standard 40% (or possibly had to bring it up with younger, high proof spirit due to evap). Either way, I’ve read in some cognac forums that the earlier bottles were dynamite while the later bottles were a massive disappointment, with little room in between.

Here’s what I think of the 2013…

Nose: sweet and herbal, with some mint, chocolate, graham cracker…mint chocolate graham cracker??? Also baking spices, like cumin, and a little ginger

Palate: velvety mouthfeel for a low proof drinker…chocolate, walnuts, nutmeg, molasses and caramel

Finish: thick and hangs on for a while despite the proof, but I wouldn’t call it long. Definitely something you want to start the night with rather than cap it off with

Thoughts

I’ve got no complaints here. Would I buy another bottle? Probably not. Do I regret buying this bottle? Nope. I think Binnys has them on clearance for $200, which isn’t bad, but there are cheaper, similar options. Also, there is a caveat here: people have said there is a massive drop-off in recent bottles (~2015sh), so buyer beware. I’d say the 2013 is good and definitely has a solid proportion of older Petite cognac, but maybe not as much as the earlier bottlings. I'd love to try one of the 2000s bottles!

Grade: B Plus

Additional information about Maison Surrenne

http://craftdistillers.com/wp-content/uploads/MS_infosheet.pdf

Monday, May 7, 2018

1974 Darroze de la Poste 48%


This is an armagnac bottled by Darroze, produced at Domaine de La Poste and comprised entirely of Ugni Blanc.  Taken from the Darroze website, de La Poste is located in the Tenaraze region, and most of the distillation that occurred at this site took place in the ‘70s. Thus, here we have a 1974. Another armagnac house that created their oak casks for aging from their local forests. I don’t know why I find that so cool, but I just do. It was bottled in 2017, making this a 43 year old armagnac. Bottled at 48% abv. Thanks to Joe L. for the sample!

1974 Darroze de la poste
48%

N: Raisins, apples, buttery. Some deeper spices and polished oak that only comes with age. It’s a very enticing nose.
T: There is immediate oak, although it’s not overbearing and is balanced by some lighter berries and orchid fruits. Then cinnamon and pepper.  Moves to darker flavors of leather, molasses, oak, and varnish.
F: Drying oak is what lingers with not too much sweetness carrying through.
O: This one shows its age, but does so pretty well for the most part. Generally speaking these are flavors that I very much enjoy, but I do think it’s just a bit tired, a bit past its prime.  The oak plays its cards a bit too heavily. I would have enjoyed to taste it with some less time in the cask.  But, a lovely old armagnac, all the same. For the oak lovers.

B+

Tuesday, April 24, 2018

Four Different Vallein-Terciniers and a Little Waxing on Terroir


When I first started exploring cognac, I thought terroir was nothing more than marketing – something brand ambassadors and salesman/saleswomen tied to a particular brandy to credit uniqueness. Among all the differences between the producers, I felt that soil was the weakest case to be made for individuality. You mean to tell me Ungi Blanc, Folle Blanche, or Colombard grapes grown 30 miles down the road really produce a vastly different cognac? I get it with wine and understand terroir is sacred, but when you strip wine down to its bare bones (i.e. through distillation), how much character can remain?

Remember, I coming from a whisky nerd’s perspective and there is little if any talk about terroir when it comes to malted barely or corn. At most, there is a smattering of GMO vs. Non-GMO that enters the discourse…maybe some regionalism when it comes to superior growing regions (like Minnesota and their wintergreeny rye) or where a particular barely was malted (floor malted or bought from Port Ellen Maltings)…I guess the case could be made for mashbills, but no one cares about the source of the grain in the mash; its all about the %s.  I think comparatively, terroir is probably the least discussed topic with whisky nerds when it comes to impact on flavor.

Well, this on-the-road hotel tasting is nice little terroir Battle Royal! 4 different cognacs, all over 40 years old, all cask strength (or maybe a little water added), all NCF/uncolored/un-boised, distilled at the same distillery (Vallein-Tercinier) from grapes from 3 different regions. I don’t know what the grapes are so that could be the X-factor.

Lot 64 Grande Champagne 42.5%
Nose: Tropical and canned fruits (like canned peaches and apricots),
Palate: Juicy, juicy fruit…its creamy, too…some orange rind, and little herbal with Arizona green tea and tarragon
Finish: long for the low proof, where the citrus just loiters
Grade: A

Rue 71 Petite Champagne 47%
Nose: Nutty with pecans and walnuts, nutmeg and brown sugar
Palate: Brown sugar, dusty orange liquer (tax stripped Contreau), tanned leather, and a little roasty (think tobacco)
Finish: Brown sugar and tobacco hang-tight
Grade: A Minus

Rue 75 Fins Bois 47%
Nose: Caramel apple, tangerine and blood orange (only because I had one the other day and its easy to recall), and a little bubble gum (not the cheap stuff)
Palate: Molasses, raisons, dates, and some earthy qualities like chamomile and mushrooms…a tad nutty, too
Finish: rich and dense, real nice length
Grade: A / A Minus (like an A half minus, if that’s a thing???)

Lot 66 Petite Champagne
Nose: Fruity and floral, rose petals and some old cracker barrel rock candy
Palate: Floral and earthy, there is some light bitter citrus, too…but the flowers dominate and I’m not in love with this one at all
Finish: Bitter and floral
Grade: B Minus

Thoughts
I’ll own-up when I’m wrong, and I’m starting to think my gut was wrong when it came to terroir. Even prior to running through these samples, I’ve been picking up on terroir and distinct flavors between the different growing regions. Not to say its completely determinative, but I’ve been noticing terroir definitely plays a role in the final character of a particular spirit, and this tasting just further evidences that. And as always, VT kills it on the quality front with the exception of the Lot 66 – that guy is just not in my wheelhouse. If I had to rank, I’d go Lot 64 > Rue 75 > Rue 71 > Lot 66. I think Ryan has the Rue 75 and Rue 71 flipped, but hey, that’s different palates for yah.

Malternative "Avant" Cognac Borderies 1925 Belgium 49%

Today’s review is of a 1925 Borderies from Malternative, an independent bottler based out of Belgium (owned by Pieter Knape) focusing on bot...